The Origin of Red Flag Laws

In Videos
May 6, 2019
DDJ
1115 Views
0 comments

That due process protection right does not exist for you.DDJ, MisandryaToday.

That due process protection right does not exist for you.

Have you noticed that the legacy media has been silent on the red flag laws. This is because they are terrified of the constitutional law debate.

Red Flag laws were created by man hating, capitalist hating, constituting hating, civil right hating feminist. These laws were patterned after civil protection orders which are just as unconstitutional being passed in socialist strongholds.

An EPRO is an Extreme Risk Protection Order and can be requested by a family member, a law enforcement officer, or an agency. This is a civil action but the government can employment it. This is a violation of the 4th and 6th amendment, Americans are entitled to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness free from government interference. It is also a 14th amendment violation of due process.

Let’s say a neighbor calls the police on you but the offices does not have a reason to charge you, the officer could file an ERPO against you ex parte. That means they can come in arrest you and take your guns away with no notice even though you are never guilty of a crime.

To obtain an ERPO with an affidavit of the facts, this is concerning because in family court women commit perjury all the time and are NEVER prosecuted for it. The basis for the #metoo movement is perjury, this is why this is so concerning. Feminist #metoo complainants never file a criminal complaint when they falsely accuse men because there are punishment for failing a false police report. This is why an affidavit singed under oath is not even worth toilet paper.

I want you to pay attention that an ERPO can be filed without any notice to the respondent (the accused). What is also important is that if the petitioner is law enforcement a petition must also be filed to search for any fire arms. Also remember that a person who gets an ERPO does to have to be a criminal, it can be anyone. The police will then get an automatic search warrant and stand in protest of this ERPO, that office can legally kill you. There have been numerous cases around the country with these gun confiscation laws where the police have murdered people with no criminal records and no guns in their profession.

To be clear, an ERPO is an ex parte order. There is no hearing with due process. You simply go in front of a judge that is not on the record, just like a civil domestic protection order. They are not recorded in any way shape or form.

The petitioner must establish proof by the preponderance of the evidence that the respondent poses a significant risk to him or himself or others by having possessing or receiving a firearm. What this means is that a preponderance of evidence is the lowest standard of proof. There is no due process, no due process, no notification, no right to face your accusers. The is no way a person who is falsely accuse to fight this action and the standard of evidence is nearly nonexistent Most family court lawyers complain that civil domestic restraining orders are given out like candy. The reality is that an ERPO will be given out like candy and used to Divorce Rape Men in every socialist anti-constitutional anti-American state shit hole that passes these laws.

The respondent must relinquish all fire arms within 24 hours of the hearing.

So remember that if law enforcement petitions for the ERPO they can go in and destroy your house by tossing it. If you have ever seen a drug house get tossed, the police destroy everything, they tear up couches, mattresses, walls, you name it. So if you are a law biding citizen and they show up with a SWAT team and you resist in any way. You are dead. They will shoot you, then destroy all your possessions all legally with out you ever stepped into a court of law. How is this not a due process violation.

Next, the continuing ERPO must be scheduled within 14 days of the initial order. If there is a “credible threat by the respondent,” meaning if she said she “feels threatened,” this way more than enough to get this granted in a civil protection court. In addition if you are in a violation of a civil protection order you quality. Meaning if you are a victim of a due process violation already and have a protection order and whether you knew it existed or not. Plenty of men get protection orders placed against them and they have no idea. Then when these men email, call, or text the person, they are put in jail for the violation for a long time.

Is there evidence of abuse of drugs or alcohol. That means on New Years Eve, did you drink a lot. Are there a bunch of beer cans in your trash. That is evident of abuse of alcohol. Did you ever get arrested with at DWI in your lifetime?

If you recently purchased a firearm or ammunition is grounds to take away your gun rights.

The reality here is that these advanced civil domestic restraining order hearing never ever have cross examinations in reality, that is a fun fact.

The court can order you to receive a mental health evaluation. In other words if you are agitated that you got your house tossed, all your possession are destroyed because you ex wants vengeance, and the judge does not like you because you ask, “why are you violating my 2nd amendment rights?” The judge will order a psych evaluation and have you declared incompetent and you are going to have to pay thousands of dollars for said evaluation too. If you really protest, the judge will place a mental involuntary hold on you to have you committed. So if I’m a judge, I can have you involuntarily committed because you purchased a gun, own a gun, or have been accused by your vindictive ex’s vengeance. That is all it takes to get you committed. Fun fact, how are you going to hold down your 9 to 5 job, if al this goes down. How is the average American who makes $35,000 a year going to afford a $20,000 law defense, because you have no right to an attorney. Why because they can’t, and that is why this is all about Cash & Prizes and Divorce Rape. Just let that sink in that if you resist any of this, we will fucking shoot you dead.

When we look at civil domestic restraining orders laws, 18 USC section 922 subsection G subsection 8, it means that you do not have to be involuntary committed of mental health issues or convicted of a crime. You just have to be given a civil domestic restraining orders of which 80% are based on perjury, fraud, and false accusations.

WHAT IS DUE PROCESS

An unbiased tribunal.
Notice of the proposed action and the grounds asserted for it.
Opportunity to present reasons why the proposed action should not be taken.
The right to present evidence, including the right to call witnesses.
The right to know opposing evidence.
The right to cross-examine adverse witnesses.
A decision based exclusively on the evidence presented.
Opportunity to be represented by counsel.
Requirement that the tribunal prepare a record of the evidence presented.
Requirement that the tribunal prepare written findings of fact and reasons for its decision.

Civil domestic restraining orders and red flag laws violate due proceeds rights a follows:

An unbiased tribunal- Judges are trained in the feminist man hating ideology called the Dututh Model of Power and Control, here men are aways the perpetrator and the women is always the victim without exception. All of this runs contrary to every scientific study and by definition people that believe in the Dultuh Model and Patriary Theory by definition are Science Deniers.

The right to present evidence- from the time a person files a petition for a civil domestic restrain order to the time it is heard is 14 days. That means that at best you have 14 days with is exactly the same as ERPO. Think about this, if they serve you on a Friday at 4:50 and your hearing is 8:00 AM Monday, how are you expect to defend against that with an attorney. The answer is you’re not. Even if you had the full 14 days, this not enough time to present evidence in any meaningful way. Most states civil procedures give a respondent 30 days to respond to interrogatory discovery and attorneys are the only ones with the power of subpoena. Meaning, if you can’t afford an attorney, you can’t subpoena anything to defend yourself.

Without an opportunity to for discovery, one cannot meaningly or credibly present evidence to protect oneself against a red flag ERPO, or civil domestic restraining order.

The right to call witnesses in the US is only by subpoena. A non-attorney cannot call an attorney. That due process protection right does not exist for you. GO FUCK YOURSELF and get RAILROADED.

The right to know opposing evidence- does not exist because the hearings are accelerated to 14 days and they bar any meaningful discovery because there is zero opportunity to know any opposing evidence, you only know the show trial allegations. In other words, if you have a normal discovery phase in any other civil trial you will have a month or two of discovery, subpoenas, question witness, and have depositors. You don’t get any of those due process protections. That due process protection right does not exist for you. GO FUCK YOURSELF and get RAILROADED.

The right to cross-examine adverse witnesses- The Domestic Violence never allow this. The judge will always bar this. The reality is that without a subpoena a witness can’t get time off from their boss to show up from work. On top of that there is no meaningful way to compile them. The sad truth that even in family law the judge never informs a subpoena if you are a man requesting it. Why this matters is that you have repeat offenders that do this as their modus operandi to commit divorce rape, why because they are given out like candy if you are a female petitioner. You have no way to see if the accuser does this as a way to make a living. You have no way to make sure that a law enforcement is corrupt. That due process protection right does not exist for you. GO FUCK YOURSELF and get RAILROADED.

A decision based exclusively on the evidence presented- All judges are trained in domestic violence the Dututh Model of Power and Control, here men are aways the perpetrator and the women is always the victim without exception. The reality is that judges are biased against men. Look at family court. Why do women get the kids 93% of the time is both parents are equal. And the sad reality is that civil domestic violence judges will grant orders as a precautionary measure all day every day without even batting an eyelash. They do this based on concern and not evidence. They are female courts based on feelings, not evidence. That due process protection right does not exist for you. GO FUCK YOURSELF and get RAILROADED.

Opportunity to be represented by counsel- the reality is that you do not get an attorney provided for you. You are going to lose your 2nd amendment rights to bear arms and you don’t get an attorney. That due process protection right does not exist for you. GO FUCK YOURSELF and get RAILROADED.

Make no mistake these laws are socialist machine to disarm and divorce rape men. They are a violation of due process and a violation of civil rights across the board. Anyone who tells you they support civil domestic retraining orders or red flag laws. Those individuals are not activist, they are un-American socialist bigots who want to disarm Americans whether they are too stupid to figure that out or not.

The Red Flag Laws are a clear violation of the 5th and 14th amendment. When feminist were taking away fathers guns rights, everyone was silent. Now feminist and socialist, everyone is acting shocked and surprised. Why are the TradCons acting surprised. I only ask because it was the conservatives that help passes these laws that violate Americans rights to own guns in the first place.

Biological science says you can’t have a family without a father, so why would TradCons stand by silently while feminist family courts violate due process to persecute fathers and to wrongfully destroy families everyday.

The reality is that due process is not a men’s rights issue, it is not a fathers rights issues. They are an American constitutional rights issue that affects every man woman and child. And those that fight to take away an Americans constitutional rights are not only Anti-Civil Rights they are Anti-American.

Make no mistake feminist, socialist, communist, and leftist are not advocating for civil rights. For decades they have actively trying to destroy it. Don’t believe it, walk into a DV court or a family court.